Back in March 2026, I reviewed the various radio receivers I used from childhood through the early 2000s. I documented my failed attempt to revive my 2003 Cambridge Soundworks 730 clock radio, and how I eventually created automations for our Google Home devices to stream Tulsa’s KWGS NPR station or Bartlesville’s KWON.
I’ve been retired for six weeks, and I will confess that I have yet to use either of those automations. However, I do listen to KWGS in the car. My 2014.5 Toyota Camry has HD Radio, so by default it can pick up the station’s three digital radio transmissions along with the regular FM analog signal. However, the KWGS HD digital signals are so weak that they frequently cut out in my car as it goes up and down the hills of Bartlesville. When 89.5-1 cuts out, the radio switches to analog 89.5, switching back to 89.5-1 when it regains signal strength. The repeated switching creates hiccups since the two are not in audio sync.
Recently, when the radio hiccuped, I would go into Options to disable HD Radio. Having to muck around with it reminded me that KWGS also broadcasts Jazz 89.5-2 and BBC World Service 89.5-3. I tuned in the jazz station, and I liked it. Too bad for me, though, since it also kept cutting out as I drove up and down in hilly Bartlesville, and there is no analog fallback for it.
A weak signal led me to turn off HD Radio on my 2014.5 Camry
I decided to give up on HD Radio entirely in the car. I didn’t want to fuss with turning it off every time I listen to the radio, so I went into our garage, put the key into the rotary ignition switch (yes, my car is old enough to still have that), turned it to the accessories position, turned on the radio, and turned off the HD Radio option. That made the setting “stick”.
I’ll be fine without HD Radio in the car, and I could always pay to restore the car’s SiriusXM satellite radio service if I wanted more options. However, I realized that I would enjoy listening to Jazz 89.5-2 at home when Wendy is away at work.
I watch Techmoan on YouTube, and in a recent post for his Patreon supporters, Mat showed his efforts to upgrade his garden shed workshop building’s external antenna to improve his reception of DAB/DAB+ and his search for a good DAB+ receiver for his component audio setup.
Open this for optional DAB/DAB+ and HD Radio specifics
DAB stands for Digital Audio Broadcasting and is used in Europe and some other areas, but not in the USA. Original DAB has broadcasts using the MP2 codec, typically at a bitrate of 128 kilobits per second or less. DAB+ offers subchannels using the HE-AAC v2 codec and is often 64 kbit/s and thus of worse audio quality than analog frequency modulation signals.
In the USA, FM HD Radio adds digital carriers to traditional 270 kHz-wide analog channels. KWGS HD1 runs at 48 kbit/s with the HDC/HE-AAC codec while it runs HD2 Jazz and HD3 BBC World Service at 24 kbit/s.
That got me to thinking about convenient ways to listen to Jazz 89.5-2 at home. I could buy a nice HD Radio like the Sangean HDR-19. However, it costs $200 and when I’m at home alone I would prefer the background music to be playing in my office, the living room, and the kitchen.
So I created a “Manor” speaker group in Google Home for the Google Nest Hubs in the office and the kitchen and the Google Home Mini in the living room. I discovered I could say, “Hey Google, play Tulsa Jazz radio on Manor” and it would play Jazz 89.5 HD2 on the various speakers via TuneIn. To shut it off, I can just say to any of the devices, “Hey Google, stop.”
In 2018 I purchased Google Nest Hub, Home Mini, and original Google Home devices
However, the audio quality was unimpressive in my office. The Nest Hub is 13′ from my desk, and it has a 1.7″ speaker. I had an original Google Home speaker from 2018 stashed away, and it has a 2″ high excursion speaker with dual 2″ passive radiators that readily outperforms a Nest Hub. So I pulled it out, plugged it in at my office desk, reset it by holding down its mute button for 15 seconds, and then added it back into our Google Home using the app on my iPhone.
That provided much richer bass, and I can now happily stream Jazz 89.5 HD2 across our home. It’s a good life.
Back in 1957, the Diffusion of Innovations theory was developed by Joe M. Bohlen, George M. Beal and Everett M. Rogers at Iowa State University. It was originally applied to agriculture and home economics, but it was later applied across disciplines. I generally think of myself as an Early Adopter in technology, but I decided to explore my actual categorizations.
The first 1/6 of folks adopting an innovation are split into a small group of Innovators, who desire to be the first to use the latest technology, and a larger fraction of Early Adopters who enjoy new innovations and are comfortable taking social risks but are largely motivated by how an innovation can drive their success. Another 1/3 are the Early Majority who adopt new innovations only after they are proven, with another trailing 1/3 in the Late Majority who are risk averse conservatives. A final 1/6 are Laggards who only use new technology when forced to do so.
I created a chart for 1980-2025 approximating when various innovative technologies appeared to have been in each stage of diffusion, adding a yellow outline for my initial year of investing in each of them. Please note that some innovations originated before 1980.
Approximate diffusion phases, based on Google Search AI queries, with yellow outlines denoting when I bought into a technology
I was an Innovator in home computers, the internet, and electronic books and an Early Adopter of CDs, MP3 players, and online audio. However, my aversion to telephones delayed my purchase of a cell phone until after the majority of American adults already had one, placing me in the Late Majority for that. I made up for that by being an Early Adopter of smartphones, for which telephony was just a minor feature to me.
You’ll notice that some digital audio formats never reached the Laggards stage, as they were steadily supplanted by later ones, as happened previously to the old analog formats of vinyl records, 8-track tapes, and compact cassettes. As for electronic books, they go way back, but they didn’t really get traction until the Amazon Kindle e-ink reader debuted in late 2007, and even now only about 1 out of 4 Americans read them, or about 40% of the 60% who read a book in a given year, so they’ve never even reached Late Majority status.
I found some interesting charts that document the rise, and sometimes the rise and fall, of different innovations. Here’s one on communications technologies:
Communication technologies in the USA during my lifetime [Source]
Telephone Service
The earlier chart shows that we have more than one mobile phone subscription per person these days since some people have multiple cell phones or have a subscription for their smartphone but another for a tablet or smartwatch. Pew Research has a different breakdown by adults, showing that in mid-2025 98% of them had a cellphone, with 91% of them having a smartphone.
While AT&T will be eliminating traditional landline telephone service in almost all states by 2029, about 1/4 still have fixed telephones, no doubt many of them VoIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) ones that rely on broadband internet. I switch from traditional landline to VoIP at Meador Manor in 2007 and two years later gave up VoIP.
Internet
Landline internet subscriptions per person is not as informative as per household. Pew Research showed that in the 2020s we plateaued with about 80% of U.S. adults subscribing to home broadband, and about 15% of U.S. adults don’t use broadband at home but do own a smartphone.
My parents owned vinyl records and 8-track tapes. When I was in high school and in my early years as an undergraduate, I bought vinyl records and created compact cassette mix tapes for use in my car. I bought my first compact disc player in 1986, and I have absolutely no use for any of the old analog formats, having endured their many limitations throughout my childhood, although I enjoy Techmoan‘s and Technology Connections‘ explorations of vintage audio tech.
I bought my first iPod back in 2004, making the switch from compact discs to MP3s. They commanded a tiny fraction of music sales revenue at the time, and only about 6% of households had an MP3 player, but Napster and Limewire had made music piracy commonplace at the start of the 21st century and steadily whittled down the immense profits being made on compact discs.
I was never a music pirate, and until 2018 I was listening to over 14,000 music files I had either purchased outright or converted from earlier digital and analog formats. I finally started using some streaming audio when we started using smart home speakers, first with Amazon’s Alexa and later Google Home. To this day, much of my listening is of tracks I purchased for my Apple Music Library, although I mostly stopped purchasing individual tracks before 2020.
Video Formats
I first experienced pre-recorded home video via some short movie excerpts on Standard 8 silent film I checked out from a public library. That was laughably bad, while VHS videotapes seemed a godsend. Until I was a year or more into my undergraduate years, VCRs were still so expensive that I rented them, and on at least one occasion I rented a Sony Betamax since a particular title I wanted to see was available on Beta, but not VHS, at my usual video rental store.
DVDs came out around 1996, and I imagine I was an Early Adopter for those, although I wasn’t an Innovator until HD-DVD came out, which was a mistake. Sometimes my higher risk tolerance does result in setbacks. I bought a Toshiba HD-DVD player in October 2007 amidst a format war between that format and the Blu-ray disc, but HD-DVD lost the war a few months later.
Thus in October 2008 I bought a Blu-ray player, shifting me back into Early Adopter status for the winning format, although I had squandered $350 in 2007 dollars, or over $550 in 2026 dollars, on my HD-DVD misadventure.
It was about then that physical media sales began their long decline, and the final physical format of Ultra HD Blu-ray never caught on with its sales peaking in 2017 and doing nothing to slow down the shift from physical media to streaming.
I wrote a year ago about AI’s potential impacts on employment, and a majority of Americans reported interacting with AI at least several times per week by September 2025. By February 2026, almost half of U.S. adults had used AI chatbots, and about 1 in 4 used them daily.
I have used AI to generate illustrative graphics for some of my blog posts, but now its imagery has flooded social media. It is busy, vibrant, glossy, and sterile.
Ugh…it is simply awful
I asked Google Gemini to apply the Diffusion of Innovations theory to the usage of modern AI, and it generated the following table:
Adopter Category
Cumulative %
Timeframe
Key Characteristics & Milestones
Innovators
2.5%
2017-2022
Initial ChatGPT launch; tech enthusiasts and developers.
Early Adopters
16%
2022-2024
Integration into professional workflows; “Pro” users and students.
Early Majority
50%
2024-2028
Cross-platform integration (Gemini, Copilot); 50% weekly use reached in early 2026.
Late Majority
84%
2028-2033 (Projected)
Use becomes a social/economic necessity; skepticism remains high.
Laggards
100%
2033+ (Projected)
Adoption only after the technology is fully embedded and unavoidable.
I attended multiple technology conference sessions on modern AI in June 2023, when it was still in the Early Adopter stage. I tested an AI chatbot for the school district website in 2024, although ultimately I opted not to deploy it. I led a district AI taskforce that developed a district policy on AI with student and staff usage guidelines and recommended rating scales. A few months out from my retirement, I built some Google Notebook LM tools on district technology and board policies that district administrators can access.
However, I am frankly relieved to have retired before AI enters the Late Majority stage. While I possessed a firm grasp of the impact of earlier technological innovations on our public schools, allowing me to successfully lead us through a 1:1 student computing initiative with learning management systems, I was less sanguine about, and frankly less interested in, adaptations to the world of AI.
I am hopeful that younger folks will be better suited to and more interested in navigating a turbulent time of white-collar job disruptions. In 2024, the Brookings Institution found that more than 30% of all workers could see at least 50% of their occupational tasks disrupted by generative AI, and in 2026 the International Monetary Fund said almost 40% of global jobs are exposed to AI-driven change.
Oklahoma has an unusual amount of geographic diversity. Contrary to ignorant images of a giant dustbowl, the state has low rolling mountains and dense pine forests, cypress swamps, and tall grass prairies, as well as the expected flat and arid high plains. Something that interests me is how climate change is gradually shifting across Oklahoma the divide between the humid, rain-fed East and the arid, drought-prone West of the continental United States.
Our state contains many distinct ecological regions, offering more varied terrain per square mile than any other state as it transitions from the Rocky Mountain foothills and high plains in the northwest to the forests, swamps, and mountain ranges in the southeast.
I grew up in Oklahoma City in the Cross Timbers Transition ecoregion, but I’ve lived more of my life in Bartlesville, which lies in the Osage Cuestas just beyond the eastern edge of the Northern Cross Timbers. You can tell the difference if you compare the Cross Timbers of Osage Hills State Park to the undulating plains east of Bartlesville, which in their natural state would be tall grass prairie.
Osage HillsBlue Mound
Back in 1960s, the state’s tourism department began taking advantage of its ecological diversity to promote six different “countries” within the Sooner State.
Red Carpet Country has massive mesas and expansive prairies and is associated with the Cheyenne, Arapaho, Ponca, Pawnee, Otoe-Missouria, Tonkawa, and Kaw tribes and nations.
Great Plains Country has wheat and cotton, stretches of mesas, and granite mountain ranges. It is associated with the Comanche, Kiowa, Apache, Wichita, and Caddo tribes and nations.
Lake & Trail Country has multiple artificial reservoirs, the remnants of the ancient Arbuckle Mountains, and it is associated with the Chickasaw Nation.
Frontier Country is a transition zone with sweeping short-grass prairies changing into woody, hilly terrain from west to east. It is associated with the Absentee-Shawnee, Citizen Potowatomi, Kickapoo, Sac & Fox, and Iowa tribes and nations.
Kiamichi Country has miles of evergreen forests and multiple mountain ranges. It is associated with the Choctaw Nation. Culturally, we know it as Little Dixie.
Green Country has lush rolling hills and lakeside resorts. It is home to the Cherokee, Osage, Muscogee (Creek), Delaware, Quapaw, Modoc, Ottawa, Seneca-Cayuga, Shawnee, and Wyandotte tribes and nations.
Bear in mind that few of those tribes and nations were in the area before white settlement and forced relocations. The region’s prehistoric peoples included the Wichita, the Caddo, and maybe some Osage and Apachean-speaking people.
Google Gemini created this collage for me, which I then tweaked
1951 aerial of the home and three city lots my parents owned in the 1970s
I grew up in Frontier Country in what was once Oklahoma Territory, spending my elementary school years living in the Cross Timbers where rugged post oak and blackjack oak grew on coarse, sandy soils. Our home sat on the middle of three city lots which back then were still filled with 70 blackjack oaks, surviving uncut within the 3.5 square mile Council Grove Military Timber Reservation established in 1874 to construct Fort Reno.
In 1884, barracks in Council Grove housed soldiers who cut timber for the fort. Council Grove was omitted from the 1889 Land Run that opened white settlement in the area, its opening being delayed until December 1899. The older part of our house had been constructed a half-century later.
My best friend and I reveled in raking up the tens of thousands of oak leaves, creating race courses for his Big Wheel and my pedal car. We would catapult ourselves into immense leaf piles. My father had a riding lawnmower and a dedicated leaf shredder to deal with it all, and eventually the dust, mites, and allergies from all of the trees led my parents to relocate.
My late best friend and I amongst the blackjack oaks
Whenever we headed west from Oklahoma City along I-40, such as to piano contests at Weatherford or to camp at Red Rock Canyon, I was struck by how the flat grasslands contrasted with the hilly and rugged Cross Timbers along the Turner Turnpike when we would drive northeast from OKC toward Tulsa.
I love hiking at the Wichita Mountains and Quartz Mountain Resort in Great Plains Country. Red Carpet Country offers Roman Nose State Park, the Little Sahara sand dunes, and the high distant Black Mesa at the westernmost end of the panhandle. Kiamichi Country’s beautiful forests offer splendid hikes at Robbers Cave and in mountain ranges like the Kiamichi and Winding Stair. In Lake & Trail Country, I enjoy Turner Falls and the Chickasaw National Recreation Area amidst the ancient Arbuckle Mountains. Finally, I have spent 37 of my 60 years living in Green Country in what was once Indian Territory.
Oklahoma’s position near the center of the continental U.S. leads to discussions about whether or not it is truly a southern state as well as whether it is part of the nation’s east or its west. There are no definitive answers, as it straddles various dividing lines, but culturally it is certainly more south and west than north and east.
Back in 1878, geologist and explorer John Wesley Powell proposed that the 100th meridian west line of longitude demarcated the difference between the humid and arid regions. That happens to be most of the western border of Oklahoma.
The aridity gradient has shifted eastward over the past century from the 100th to the 98th meridian
By 2100, that gradient will have shifted to the 96th meridian which forms the western edge of Bartlesville and aligns with Tulsa and Okmulgee. In the 22nd century, Osage, Pawnee, and Creek counties will no longer be part of Green Country. The shift in climate is apparent in the droughts that imposed water restrictions in Bartlesville in 2001-2002 and again in 2022-2023.
They modeled the human climate “niche” to identify regions where temperature and precipitation have been most suitable for humans to live over the past 6,000 years. Bartlesville is currently very suitable, although I find our summers rather miserable.
Here is what the niche looks like by 2070 in a moderate carbon emissions scenario. Bartlesville would remain in the zone, but Oklahoma City would not. That shifting aridity zone is more of a problem for the southern latitudes.
In the case of extreme global warming, which I consider more likely, Bartlesville would be near the southern boundary of the suitable zone. I find it interesting how northern and western New Mexico would become more suitable, along with the area south of the Great Lakes plus North Dakota and much of Montana.
In the high emissions scenario, by mid-century Bartlesville would still only have one wet bulb day per year on average, when the body can no longer cool itself by sweating. So while we’ll have many more days of high temperatures, at least the humidity won’t make it as miserable as it will be in the states east of us.
Washington County would only average a very large fire once per century, while northern Nevada and California, southeastern Oregon, and southwestern Idaho would become a wildfire zone.
Sea level rise, of course, will not be an issue here, but the Chemical Coast of Texas and Louisiana, where 84% of US plastics are produced, will be in trouble, as will most of the eastern seaboard.
Farm crop yields will take a big hit around here while improving in the upper midwest, around the Great Lakes, and surrounding the Rocky Mountains.
Happily, Oklahoma is projected to have little economic damage, unlike our neighbors to the north and south.
Domestic migration patterns show some people moving to areas that will become more livable over time, but the sun belt continues to attract many people, despite the inevitable and difficult adaptations to climate impacts they will face.
Alternate histories have been a literary trope for over two thousand years. Livy posed the question, in Parts 17-19 of Book 9 of his From the Founding of the City, “What would have been the results for Rome if she had been engaged in war with Alexander?”
In 1889, Mark Twain wrote of A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur’s Court. In 1939, L. Sprague de Camp speculated in Lest Darkness Fall on what might have happened if an American archaeologist of his era were transported to 6th Century Rome. In 1962, Philip K. Dick’s The Man in the High Castle explored a timeline in which Nazi Germany and the Japanese Empire won World War II and partitioned the former United States.
In more recent times, we have multiverses in the Marvel and DC comics and their film franchises, in Star Trek, in 2022’s Everything Everywhere All at Once, and many more.
Let’s briefly explore an alternate timeline in which the Oklahoma Territory, organized in 1890, and Indian Territory, which first originated in 1834, rather than being merged into the state of Oklahoma in 1907, had instead been admitted as the respective separate states of Oklahoma and Sequoyah.
The proposal for a State of Sequoyah made it as far as a draft constitution with an election in November 1905 in which 56,279 voted in favor of it, 9,073 voted against it, and many more declined to vote. The concept was doomed, since neither Congress nor President Theodore Roosevelt supported it. The Republican-led government feared that the heavily Native American and Southern-leaning Indian Territory would became a new Democratic stronghold if it were granted statehood, and many whites favored aggressive assimilation of the tribes over preserving their sovereignty.
Bartlesville was situated in the proposed Skiatook County, which was a bit wider than modern-day Washington County and considerably truncated to the north and south.
Claude.ai generated this abomination
I wanted an overlay map comparing Oklahoma’s northeastern county boundaries to the State of Sequoyah’s counties. I wondered if an artificial intelligence could save me the effort of creating one. The answer at this point, and with my unpaid access, was No when I tried Google Gemini, ChatGPT, and Claude, with the last of those talking a good game yet producing an absurd abomination.
So I overlaid the State of Sequoyah map over one of modern-day Oklahoma which showed county lines in brown. I dialed down the Sequoyah map’s opacity and traced by hand blue outlines of several of the northeastern Sequoyah counties, adding blue labels.
My own “natural intelligence” allowed me to craft this overlay
Neither map designated county seats, although we know that Bartlesville has always been the seat of Oklahoma’s Washington County. As for the State of Sequoyah, its constitution held that whichever city in each county received the most votes in the November 1905 election would become the seat.
A Bartlesville newspaper dismissed the November 1905 referendum
The turnout in “Skiatook County” was pitiful, with only 14 votes cast in Bartlesville, of which only two were residents and the others from country voters, 11 of them from the First Peoples. That in a town which by then had boomed to three or four thousand people, reflecting the disdain many had for two states instead of one being formed from the two territories.
Dewey and Ramona had polls open, but when no one had appeared to vote by noon, they were closed. Other towns in the area, such as Wann, Copan, Ochelata, Vera, and Collinsville, did not even conduct elections.
Skiatook, the county’s namesake, did muster 61 votes, of which 51 favored the constitution and 10 opposed its adoption. Had Congress supported the State of Sequoyah, that would have made Skiatook the county seat, way down in the southwest corner, despite it having perhaps one-tenth of the population of Bartlesville. As it turned out, the town of Skiatook landed in Oklahoma’s Tulsa county, and Washington County also omitted Collinsville while gaining Copan.
I like the inherent symbolism in how the proposed Great Seal of the State of Sequoyah would have inverted the main star when compared to the Great Seal of the State of Oklahoma that was actually adopted two years later.
What might have been versus what actually happened
A decade ago I purchased Kindle edition of The Stories of John Cheever, a collection which won a Pulitzer. I knew The New Yorker had published over 120 of his short stories, and I knew that The Swimmer, a 1968 movie with Burt Lancaster which used to be advertised in UHF television promos, was based on one of them.
I had never watched the film, but I read Cheever’s tale of Neddy Merrill’s journey through a chain of neighborhood swimming pools, an allegory for the aging process, the fading of the American Dream, and the consequences of self-delusion.
I enjoyed the story and another famous story of his, The Enormous Radio, but then I was distracted by something and time marched on. I got married, my teaching career ended, and nine years farther along, with my administrative career drawing to a close, I asked Google Gemini, What are the most joyful and optimistic books in the Modern Library’s 100 Best Novels of the 20th Century? It acknowledged those are rare, but one of its answers was a novel by John Cheever.
The Wapshot Chronicle was his debut novel in 1957 and reportedly was the first novel selected for The Book of the Month Club to include the f-bomb in the narrative. That’s an interesting distinction.
The novel opens in New England, just north of Boston, in Cheever’s fictional town of St. Botolphs. It had undergone historical decline in its economic and spiritual vitality since the mid-19th century and was populated with eccentric characters. A young adult man’s hookup with a traffic accident victim is witnessed from a bedroom closet by his first cousin once removed, who holds the family pursestrings. She has him ejected out into the world “to prove himself” which in turn inspires his less capable younger brother to also self-deport himself from New England.
Interestingly, the two brothers follow separate tracks. In transitioning from short stories to a novel, Cheever wrote three narratives, linking them intermittently, centered on a father and his two sons. This facilitates his shifting prose style as he crafts a discursive and episodic narrative structure. However, it does read as a novel, unlike my previous read from the Modern Library list, Sherwood Anderson’s Winesburg, Ohio, which was really just a linked set of short stories.
The father’s tale is distinguished by staccato rhythmic jottings in his journal and some epistles. They reveal deep-seated psychological struggles, including feelings of emasculation and sexuality. It is more cohesive than , but it certainly could be as choppy as the waters of the bay plied by the father’s doomed ferry.
The older son, whose illicit lovemaking prompted his banishment from St. Botolphs, initially landed in Washington, DC. There he continued his licentious ways while his inept younger brother landed in New York City and has a series of slapstick adventures. He gets married, only to be shipped off to a remote island in the Pacific as a “taper” or early computer programmer, later being relocated to a suburban hellscape at an east coast military base.
What time is it?
I am unfamiliar with New England, having only been in downtown Boston for a conference in 1999. My other visits to the east coast have been confined to the mid-Atlantic states, with brief visits to New York, Wilmington, Atlantic City, and Baltimore, plus three visits to Washington, DC and three to Philadelphia. New England strikes us Okies as quite old, so for much of the novel I lacked sufficient familiarity with context clues to judge the timeframe. Over 2/3 of the way through the novel, there was mention of an “old DC-4”, which was a plane manufactured in the 1940s, so I finally figured out that The Wapshot Chronicle was set close to the timeframe in which it was published. It is thus somewhat a tale of the 1950s, albeit with frequent flashbacks and plenty of mythic realism and nostalgia.
Writing what he knew
It is said that the characters in the two Wapshot novels were based on Cheever’s family members. The father figure reflected his own father’s career in shoes which collapsed in the Great Depression, leaving him an embittered alcoholic, living alone in a decaying farmhouse on the South Shore. The mother is like Cheever’s strong-minded and pragmatic wife. The cousin once removed is an amalgam of various family elders. The older brother was based on Cheever’s own older brother, Fred, whom he idolized, and the younger brother represents Cheever himself, with his own conflicted bisexuality. He imbues both of the brothers in his first novel, as well as the father, with his own voracious sex drive and confusions.
Fred & John Cheever with their father; John and Fred Cheever in 1931 at roughly ages 19 and 23
A biographical parallel was how his own mother, like the one in the novel, opened a gift shop to make ends meet after her husband lost his income. In the novel, the father’s little ferry boat sank, but that rather obvious metaphor was saved by Cheever’s prose:
She took the waves head on, like an old rocking horse. Waves broke over the glass of the wheelhouse so that Leander had to keep one hand on the windshield wiper to see. The water pouring down the decks began to come in at the cabin. It was dirty weather. Leander thought of the passengers—the girl with the rose in her hair and the man with three children, all wearing shirts cut of the same cloth as his wife’s summer dress. And what about the passengers themselves, sitting in the cabin? Were they frightened? They were, nine times out of ten, their fear clothed lightly in idle speculation. They fished for their key rings and their small change, gave their privates a hitch and, if they had some talisman, a silver dollar or a St. Christopher medal, they rubbed it with their fingers. St. Christopher, be with us now! They readjusted their garters if they wore them, tightened the knots in their shoelaces and their neckties and wondered why their sense of reality should seem suspended. They thought of pleasant things: wheat fields and winter twilights, when five minutes after the lemony yellow light in the west was gone the snow began to fall, or hiding jelly beans under the sofa cushions on Easter Eve. The young man looked at the girl with the rose in her hair, remembering how generously she had spread her legs for him and now how fair and gentle she seemed.
In the middle of the bay Leander turned the boat toward Travertine. It was the worst of the trip, and he was worried. The following sea punished her stern. Her screw shook the hull at the crest of every wave and in the hollow she slipped to port. He set his bow on Gull Rock, which he could see clearly then, the gull droppings on top and the sea grass fanning out as the waves mounted and swallowed the granite pile. Beyond the channel he would be all right with nothing ahead of him but the run up the calm river to home. He put his mind on this. He could hear the deck chairs smashing against the stern rail and she had taken in so much water that she heeled. Then the rudder chain broke with the noise of a shot and he felt the power of the helm vanish into thin air beneath his hands.
Cheever was gentle in that instance — the little ferry boat was no RMS Titanic, and no one perished. In the excerpt you will note how Cheever, ahem, inserted sexuality into his writing. There is an entire chapter addressing homosexual arousals in the two sons, albeit without any form of consummation. Cheever opened that chapter with a warning: “And now we come to the unsavory or homosexual part of our tale and any disinterested reader is encouraged to skip.”
The final part of the first book has a bizarre escapade in a variation of Manderley from Daphne du Maurier’s Rebecca, populated by an aged distant cousin and her beautiful ward in a relationship that reminds one of Miss Havisham and Estella from Dickens’ Great Expectations. Cheever notes how the grand old mansions of the robber barons days had been altered:
…nothing was any more what it had aimed to be or what it would be in the end and the house that had meant to express familial pride was now a funeral parlor, the house that had meant to express worldly pride was a rooming house, Ursuline nuns lived in the castle that was meant to express the pride of avarice, but through this erosion of purpose Moses thought he saw everywhere the impress of human sweetness and ingenuity.
I appreciate how he lightened the observations with that final phrase. One of the sons remains a horndog who cannot distinguish love from lust. He is incurious and willing to tolerate the bad food and unhappy lodging with his aged distant cousin so long as he can bed her ward, a previously married woman in her late 20s. He scrambles across the roof of the crumbling mansion of Clear Haven, like previous paramours, to travel from a guest room to the woman’s bed. Cheever’s prose is masterful:
…it was the roofs of Clear Haven, to be seen only by the birds or a stray airplane, where the architect had left bare the complexity of his task—in a sense his defeat—for here all the random majesty of the place appeared spatchcocked, rectified and jumbled; here, hidden in the rain, were the architect’s secrets and most of his failures. Peaked roofs, flat roofs, pyramidal roofs, roofs inset with stained-glass skylights and chimneys and bizarre systems of drainage stretched for a quarter of a mile or more, shining here and there in the light from a distant dormer window like the roofs of a city.
The tale is somewhat comedic, with no one living in the estate having the least bit of sense, but it is also a tale of a wife’s embittered transformation into an asexual being who emasculates her husband. This is clearly drawn from Cheever’s lifelong marriage in which he was repeatedly subjected to the silent treatment, as mentioned in a great 2009 article on him and his family by Rachel Cooke in The Guardian. He was mystified by his own wife and the different personas she could inhabit, while he was a bisexual drunkard who was unable to form a deep, lasting, and mutual romantic bond with another person.
In du Maurier’s Rebecca, the mansion of Manderley burns in a fire that is the culmination of secrets and guilt. Cheever’s The Wapshot Chronicle ends similarly, and its burning releases the ward and her horndog husband from the spell of his old cousin, but we can infer that the marriage, like the estate, will not endure. In fact, in the sequel, it is her sexual needs and the poor choices she makes to fulfill them that dominate the narrative.
One positive theme in the book is of the value of communities. However, Cheever also portrays the oppressive control of older generations and repeatedly conflates physical and romantic love. The first book is not a triumph, but it was certainly interesting. A weakness in the Clear Haven segment is the introduction of an ex-husband of one of the son’s brides. This strange interloper provides comedy, but he would fit better into a short story than suddenly appearing 9/10 of the way through a novel.
The Sequel
The 1958 National Book Award and Book of the Month Club selection spurred Cheever to publish a sequel in 1964: The Wapshot Scandal. It is darker and more cynical and satirical than the first book. The Wapshot boys and their wives are living in archetypes of suburbia and the Cold War, with the drinking, betrayals, and sexual misadventures that one would expect given Cheever’s own history, but his cynicism is again leavened:
The village, he knew, had, like any other, its brutes and its shrews, its thieves, and its perverts, but like any other it meant to conceal these facts under a shrine of decorum that was not hypocrisy but a guise or mode of hope.
The sequel garnered the 1965 William Dean Howells Medal, which is awarded every five years to a distinguished American novel. I’ve only heard of five of the past winners. Over Winter Break in 2012, I happened to have read the 1930 winner, Willa Cather’s Death Comes for the Archbishop, which is a far cry from The Wapshot Scandal.
In the meta-analysis at The Greatest Books, that sequel is rated lower than the first Wapshot book and two of his subsequent novels, while his Pulitzer-prizewinning short story collection outranks them all.
Year Published
Title
Rank (June 2026)
1957
The Wapshot Chronicle
1,152
1964
The Wapshot Scandal
16,993
1969
Bullet Park
7,810
1977
Falconer
4,525
1978
The Stories of John Cheever
680
1982
Oh What a Paradise It Seems
–
That did not deter me from reading The Wapshot Scandal, to find out the ultimate fates of his characters and note the progress in his ability to write a novel. However, before tackling the sequel, I did make an aborted attempt at reading Many Marriages by Sherwood Anderson. It felt awkward and strange after Cheever’s smooth prose.
I enjoyed multiple vignettes from Cheever’s sequel. Consider his description of a young wife’s discontent:
Betsey had not rallied from the failure of her cocktail party. She hated Talifer and squarely blamed Coverly for making her live there. She avenged herself by sleeping alone and by not speaking to her husband. She complained loudly to herself about the house, the neighborhood, the kitchen, the weather and the news in the papers. She swore at the mashed potatoes, cursed the pot roast, she damned the pots and pans to hell and spoke obscenely to the frozen apple tarts, but she did not speak to Coverly. Every surface of life—tables, dishes and the body of her husband—seemed to be abrasive facets of a stone that lay in her path. Nothing was right. The sofa hurt her back. She could not sleep in her bed. The lamps were too dim to read by, the knives were too dull to cut butter, the television programs bored her although she watched them faithfully. The greatest of Coverly’s hardships was the breakdown in their sexual relationship. It was the crux, the readiest source of vitality in their marriage, and without this her companionship became painful.
The critique of suburban conformity that I recall from childhood was the dystopian planet of Camazotz in Madeleine L’Engle’s A Wrinkle in Time. Another I am aware of, but have not yet read, is Richard Yates’s debut novel of 1961, Revolutionary Road. I was glad to find that The Wapshot Scandal was not limited to suburbia, wandering episodically through other realms as well, although yet again Cheever’s tapestry had thin spots, with too few threads weaving the parts into a whole. It is far more satisfying to me when seemingly unrelated storylines are eventually pieced together. Examples of that in film would be Tarantino’s Pulp Fiction and Paul Thomas Anderson’s Magnolia.
Cheever’s characters find happiness elusive, their existences shot through with pangs of sexual desire that lead them to destructive decision-making. They tranquilize themselves with alcohol, and their tales are most satisfying when they are comic, frantic, or both. Cheever could still compose brilliant paragraphs.
He thought he saw on the beach the change from one form of life to another. The sea grass dies, dries, flies like a swallow on the wind and that angry-looking tourist will make a lamp base out of the piece of driftwood he carries. The line of last night’s heavy sea is marked with malachite and amethyst, the beach is scored with the same lines as the sky; one seemed to stand in some fulcrum of change, here was the barrier, here as the wave fell was the line between one life and another, but would any of this keep him from squealing for mercy when his time came?
Cheever pours into them his existential crises, depression, and ennui, alongside his lusts for sex and liquor. The sad tale of one of the wives, with her on-again off-again trysts with a beautiful, stupid, and ever-hungry 19-year-old supermarket stockboy, concludes with her in a foreign supermarket. Cheever evokes the tragedy of her existence as she shops for her hungry boy toy.
Here she disengages one wagon with a light ringing of metal from a chain of hundreds and begins to push her way through the walls of American food. Grieving, bewildered by the blows life has dealt her, this is some solace, this is the path she takes. Her face is pale. A stray curl hangs against her cheek. Tears make the light in her eyes a glassy light but the market is crowded and she is not the first nor the last woman in the history of the place to buy her groceries with wet cheeks. She moves indifferently with the alien crowd as if these were the brooks and channels of her day. No willow grows aslant this stream of men and women and yet it is Ophelia that she most resembles, gathering her fantastic garland not of crowflowers, nettles and long purples, but of salt, pepper, Bab-o, Kleenex, frozen codfish balls, lamb patties, hamburger, bread, butter, dressing, an American comic book for her son and for herself a bunch of carnations. She chants, like Ophelia, snatches of old tunes. “Winstons taste good like a cigarette should. Mr. Clean, Mr. Clean,” and when her coronet or fantastic garland seems completed she pays her bill and carries her trophies away, no less dignified a figure of grief than any other.
There is power in Cheever’s writing, but like so many of the Modern Library selections, it can be quite gloomy. The old cousin in his tale, who began the sons’ banishment, goes on a comical sea voyage to Europe as she flees the consequences of income tax evasion, but in the end she dies miserably, with the modern world driving her, like so many other characters, toward alcoholism and despair.
Epilogue
Cheever’s own alcoholism became severe in the 1960s, and in the early 1970s he nearly drank himself to death, ending up straightjacketed with delirium tremens from alcohol withdrawal after being hospitalized. In 1975, he was admitted to the Smithers Alcoholism Treatment and Training Center in Manhattan and finally sobered up for his final seven years of life.
By then his brain had already atrophied, leading to minor hallucinations, although he managed to finish Falconer, which told of a university professor and drug addict serving time in Falconer State Prison for the murder of his brother. The convict reportedly struggles to retain his humanity in the prison and begins an affair with a fellow inmate.
Cheever himself embarked on a years-long sexual relationship with a young male writer, who lived with Cheever’s family for some time. His wife was quite aware of his bisexuality and various trysts, but his son and daughter seemed oblivious until he confessed to them shortly before his death in 1982 at age 70.
I’m glad I read Cheever’s first two novels, although I plan to stick to his short stories after this. I’ve heard him called the “Chekhov of the Suburbs” and while on vacation in the Pacific Northwest I purchased The Portable Chekhov and read three of his stories. They were melancholy and almost without plot, so I’ll need to be in the right mood to return to Chekhov or Cheever.