While I’ve used cameras for years, only since my second trip to the Pacific Northwest in 2005 have I paid much attention to taking quality landscape photographs despite the limitations of a camera small enough to conveniently carry on any day hike. I’ve already documented the computers I’ve used over the years, and now will look back at the still-photograph cameras of my past.
I grew up with photographs, although they were always small snapshots. My earliest experience with a snapshot camera was my parents’ Kodak Instamatic X-15 with its “126” film cartridges and rotating flash cube. It shot a 26.5 mm square on-film image. About 10 million cameras used that film format, but it is now extinct.
The camera was extremely simple to operate – you just looked through the viewfinder and pushed a lever. If you thought you might need flash, you popped in a flash cube and it would explode one of its four bulbs, rotating for the next shot. After taking a shot you had to shove a spring-loaded lever on its back a couple of times to advance the film. Sometimes you forgot, and that created interesting double-exposed images. Of course, you might not know that for weeks or months, depending on when you finally sent in the film to be developed – and we didn’t have one-hour photo processing back then.
My own first camera was a bulky used Polaroid unit we had inherited. It took dreadful pictures which literally stank – from the chemicals used for its instant pictures. It was definitely not a case of instant gratification, however, as most of its output was sickly green shots with brown smears, and none were worth keeping or even looking at. Some of my relatives loved taking Polaroids, but I never cared for them.
I took a one-semester photography class in junior high, and for that occasion received my own Kodak Ektralite unit. It took poor point-and-shoot pictures on “110” film cartridges, but at least it had a built-in flash instead of the rotating flashcubes. Its pitiful 13 x 17 mm on-film images did not hold a candle to the fancy 35 mm single lens reflex camera they had at school. But even when I used the school camera, my photography was utterly uninspired.
Our photography classroom had chalkboards on three walls, and the coach who taught the class often already had them filled with notes when we walked in. I remember writing down the notes from one set of boards, rotating my seat to face another wall and copy down more notes, and then rotating again to copy down the third wall of notes. The only real fun was when we’d get our turn to work in the darkroom with the chemical baths and enlarger. So at least we got to develop contact sheets and some black-and-white prints. Our end-of-year project was an 8×10 print, and my choice to shoot a garbage can in the school corridor was a mixture of rebellion and apathy.
I took the 110 with me on a trip to Washington, DC in 1984, and afterward noticed how awful its prints looked. So I bought a cheap 35 mm point-and-shoot to replace it – it might have been a Pentax, but I cannot recall. The new camera did much better on vacations, and I did manage to take one great photograph with it, of wildflowers in the Wichita Mountains Wildlife Refuge near Lawton. I used it sparingly for about a decade of vacation snapshots.
The late 1990s brought my last, and by far my favorite, film camera. My original Canon Elph was an APS point-and-shoot camera with a 24-48 mm zoom lens. APS stood for Advanced Photo System and meant you had a convenient 35 mm cartridge. The APS let you rewind a roll mid-way through using it if you liked, and you could glance at a roll’s indicator to see if it was fresh, partially shot, or expended. You could shoot in three different aspect ratios up to a 30.2 × 16.7 mm on-film image, and your prints came with contact sheets and an intact cartridge which made storage easy and allowed for convenient reprocessing for enlargements and duplications.
All of that in a camera the size of a package of cigarettes was pretty amazing at the time, and the Elph was in its day the world’s smallest autofocus zoom camera. But APS never caught on and it was rapidly made obsolete by the digital revolution. The most significant use of this camera was my first trip to the Pacific Northwest back in 1998, and the panoramic prints from that trip still look great today, although I haven’t bothered to scan any onto Flickr.
In 2000 I made the transition to digital photography with the quite expensive $1,000 Nikon CoolPix 990. Huge by today’s standards, it was split down the middle with a swivel lens. The 3.1-megapixel camera took 2048 x 1536 images and had a 3x optical zoom. It also shot 320 x 240 movies, although I hardly ever used that mode. The camera used 64 MB Compact Flash cards for storage, which at the time cost $250 each!
I took a lot of pictures on the Nikon, because I used it to create the now-retired Building on Excellence website that fully documented a series of construction projects at my workplace.
It was superseded in 2005 by the tiny Canon Powershot Elph SD300, a $350 4-megapixel unit that took 2272 x 1704 images and had a 3x optical zoom. It also shot 640 x 480 videos. This camera was my delightful little companion on four summer trips to the Pacific Northwest and a slew of day hikes in 2009.
Thinking I might shoot some longer videos, in 2008 I bought a cheap Flip video camcorder, but was singularly unimpressed by its output. I only used it a couple of times, considered its abilities to be almost as poor as the camera in my iPhone 3G. That fixed-focus camera in my first smartphone had grainy, off-color, and blurry output. It was just a nasty little thing, which none of the many camera and photo applications I downloaded could really help much. But it did allow me to instantly upload a photo to the cloud, which was fun.
In November 2009 I replaced the tiny Elph SD300 with a Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS3, a $280 10.1-megapixel unit that took 3648 x 2736 images and had an amazing 12x optical zoom. It could also shoot 1280 x 720 video, and had image stabilization, panorama assist, and other neat features. I was amazed by how much more powerful, yet far smaller and cheaper, the camera was when compared to the Coolpix 990.
My next digital camera was in the iPhone 4 I purchased in the summer of 2010. It was a vast improvement over that of the previous iPhone, with better resolution, flash, and video and HDR modes. The cameras in my iPad 2 of 2011 were inferior and I almost never used them.
By 2011 I was very tired of editing GPS coordinates for the hundreds of day hiking photos I regularly uploaded to Flickr, so I bought a Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10, a $387 14.1 megapixel unit which took 4320 x 3240 images and had a 16x optical zoom. It could shoot 1920 x 1280 video. I wanted manual control of the aperture and so forth, but never used that feature. Instead the most important feature to me was the built-in GPS unit which geotagged my shots for me. It was the same compact size as my previous camera, so it was easy to carry on my belt for my various day hikes.
However, one disadvantage of both of my Panasonics was that after awhile fibers or hairs were present on the interior lens, creating dark spots on my shots. I used my vacuum cleaner on the ZS10 and managed to dislodge the worst offenders, but later it started not focusing properly on shots, with no discernible pattern of when it would go blurry on me.
So in April 2012 I bought a Canon PowerShot SX260 HS for $300 with 12.1 megapixels (4000 x 3000 pixels) and 20x image stabilized optical zoom. I did not mind the slight reduction in pixels since the big zoom meant I did not have to crop photos all that much, 1080 pixel video is plenty, and this camera had the GPS geotagging I still considered a prerequisite, but later gave up on. Its sensor and lens could not match a digital SLR, but I still prized a slim lightweight camera above everything else since most of my photography was on the trail, and the camera survived a fall from a cliff, so it was rugged. The camera’s monitor tended to overexpose shots, and I had to be patient to give the GPS time to lock in, but overall the shot quality was the best I had ever had with a digital camera.
In fall 2012 I upgraded to the iPhone 5, which improved upon the decent camera in the iPhone 4, but I used my smartphone cameras sparingly since they lacked optical zoom. The only advantages over my Canon PowerShot was that a smartphone camera was usually with me and shots were quickly uploaded to the cloud.
In June 2014 my Canon Powershot SX260 HS, which had survived a fall from a high cliff and hard use on the trails, would no longer fully open or close its lens cover. I had no luck getting it to working properly again, although I could manually open and close the shutter for photography. So I decided to replace it for our big summer vacation.
I purchased the next generation of the same camera, a Canon Powershot SX280 HS, for $210. It still had 12.1 megapixels (4000 x 3000 pixels) and 20x optical stabilized zoom, with a new processor allowing for less noise at higher ISO levels and 1080 pixel video at 60 frames per second, and faster autofocus. The big addition for me was WiFi connectivity so that I could sync photos with my iPhone on trips for higher-quality photos on Facebook updates.
A year later, I gave that camera away as I had upgraded to a Canon PowerShot SX700 HS for $279. The resolution was now up to 16.1 megapixels (4608 x 2592 pixels) with 30x optical stabilized zoom. I managed to misplace that camera in September 2015, along with the old PowerShot SX260 HS, so in October I ponied up $339 to buy another SX700 HS. I paid a premium for that older model over the more recent SX710 HS, after a review said image quality was superior on the older model.
In 2016 my new communications job in the district found me relying upon my PowerShot superzooms for photos at district events. They worked okay, but a camera with a real flash system and larger sensor seemed a wise investment. So in 2017 I purchased a refurbished Canon EOS Rebel T6 with EF-S 18-55 image-stabilization lens and EF 75-300 mm f/4-5.6 III lens, plus a Neewar Flash unit. The entire package with accessories set me back $681. The camera body has an 18.7 megapixel APS-C sensor (5184 x 3456 pixels; 22.3 x 14.9 mm). I found the zoom range of the EF-S 18-55 lens too limiting, so I splurged on a used Canon EF 24–105mm f/4L IS II USM Lens for $825. It is quite bulky and heavy, but it gives great results.
Now I rarely use a dedicated camera, taking most shots, whether for business or pleasure, on my latest iPhone.